Words, Mindless Words
by Leland B. Yeager | Posted August 19, 2012
An Allstate ad in a recent Wall Street Journal has set me to wondering whether vogue words in ordinary speech and political speech are examples of the same mindless imitation. “Allstate led the fight by advocating for national Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) standards.” But why the “for”?
Because that extra word, like “advocate” itself, has become the latest vogue. “Prior to” and “incredible” have long become so deeply entrenched that they hardly seem like vogues any more. “Thrust,” as in the “thrust” of a speech or a proposal, enjoyed a vogue some years ago; but it seems to have gone out of fashion.
Nowadays terms like “crumbling infrastructure,” “climate change” (the currently more voguish term for “global warming”), “big corporations,” corporate and individual “greed,” the “1%” and “99%," “fair share,” “shipping jobs overseas,” “obesity epidemic,” and miscellaneous “crises” crop up everywhere. Often they carry policy implications. I wonder whether they betray the same mindlessness as “advocate for.”
Leland B. Yeager is Ludwig von Mises Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Economics at Auburn University.
Share This
Main menu
Search Liberty
Timebound
to be considered for
immediate publication
Most Read
Monthly archive
- November 2010 (24)
- December 2010 (24)
- January 2011 (31)
- February 2011 (17)
- March 2011 (29)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (22)
- June 2011 (18)
- July 2011 (20)
- August 2011 (20)
- September 2011 (19)
- October 2011 (18)
- November 2011 (17)
- December 2011 (15)
- January 2012 (21)
- February 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (18)
- April 2012 (16)
- May 2012 (20)
- June 2012 (14)
- July 2012 (24)
- August 2012 (20)
- September 2012 (19)
- October 2012 (19)
- November 2012 (21)
- December 2012 (17)
- January 2013 (21)
- February 2013 (16)
- March 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (16)
- May 2013 (12)
- June 2013 (9)

Comments
Luther Jett
How about my long-standing pet peeve, "greenhouse gases"? Did you ever see a greenhouse emitting fumes? No, it's simply a nonsensical phrase which presupposes a "greenhouse effect" caused by the burning of petroleum products. The term has become so ubiquitous it almost qualifies as an idiom, and I fear it will never go away
Tue, 2012-08-21 22:15
JEyon
Luther -
the phrase "greenhouse gases" does not only refer to gases produced by fossil fuel burning - it refers to other gases such as water vapor - the most potent of the greenhouse gases
nor does is it used in the metaphorical way you suggest - as gases being released by a greenhouse - just the opposite - the term comes from the fact that the gases keep warmth contained - which is what a gardeners greenhouse does
of course - the greenhouse metaphor is imperfect - that's not exactly how the gases work - and that might be worth getting peeved about
but careful scientific types - both proAGW and antiAGW - are probably already peeved over your post
Thu, 2012-08-23 23:45